
Not quite a food news item, but certainly one of agricultural importance.
It seems farmers in North Dakota, perhaps
the most inhospitable state in the Union,
are trying their damndest to get licensed to grow
industrial hemp. There's a wealth of information about industrial hemp on the web, you can really blow off productive hours in the "office" researching the subject. Perhaps these Great Plains farmers have been researching hemp from the cabs of their
gigantic sprayers, because some of them are ready and rarin to go. They have to get approval from the DEA first, though - good luck farmers. If they can pull it off, we might see the spark of an agricultural upheaval in this country as we can finally put our land to some productive use besides growing the ingredients for
Doritos. I say to thee - Harness the all-mighty and incredible diversity of applications that hemp can be put towards, from seed oils to fibers, and of course gigantic spaceship sized joints that
barely get you high which is why the whole
DEA argument seems like such a ridiculous mind-fuck.
Hemp, as the picture to the above left shows, must be grown in tight packs in order to maximize the seed-producing potential of the plant, whereas marijuana is ideally grown with maximum space available to encourage the largest buds. Of course there is disinformation on all sides of this issue, and air-tight arguments in favor of industrial hemp production always get holes poked in them by folks with "scientific" research that is most likely funded through the same disreputable channels that spent so much money on the
brain-egg metaphor.
The information sworl of dis-info and questionable research surrounding industrial hemp is not surprising given we are at least tangentially also discussing psycho-active drugs, which always inspire the ire and attention of law-makers, law-enforcers, and law-lovers. But, you would think that the
agricultural traditions of this great land of lands - our
Jeffersonian heritage as a great bastion for farmers and the Washington/Jefferson understanding of hemp's infinite usefulness - would at least bring some red-white-blue tears to the eyes of the most stalwart Patriots considering the allowance of growing ganja's cousin. We would be helping solve oh-so-many problems in the process. But alas, fear of the
schedule 1 controlled substance may be enough to block even the efforts of North Dakota's finest agricultural entrepreneurs.
North Dakota is such a wasteland, there is barely any value to the land as residential property. (So Dakotans might feel offense at my stark indictment of their state, but I think the temperatures and declining population figures suggest that North Dakota is pretty dark and lonely - the deaths outnumber the births, people are moving away.) Some land use and economic development planners actually argue that the best way to deal with North

Dakota would be to round up all the land and make it into a
Buffalo Commons, That term, buffalo commons, was actually coined by a couple of
East Coast intellectuals, but despite that potentially searing origin, the idea has really caught on. It appeals to the need to conserve land and it invokes some pretty
deep sentiments about the West, America, and old nickels. Sort of a reactionary reversal to the way it
used to be, back in the days of railroads, cowboys, indians, and harlots, but equally a deep, meaningful preface to an acceptance of the potential post-apocalyptic abandonment of sparse regions where wind and animals roll, and humans come to visit, marvel, hunt, and leave. There are some areas of the Great Plains where the population density is less than 2 persons per square mile. For a comparison, in our very own
Orange County, North Carolina there are around 300 people per square mile, and parts of this county are downright rural.
If the Buffalo Commons project were to be pulled off, our Great Plains would revert to large contiguous tracks of native grasslands where native mammals like
bison and
prarie dogs would be free to live. Apparently, Ted Turner already owns a bunch of land devoted to this purpose, and bison populations are taking off. I think of it as a progressive method of adjusting land uses in the face of very real geographic change, change from needless commodity mono-cropping on massive tracts of land, crops we have to force down people's throats in highly processed forms like partially hydrogenated soybean oil and high fructose corn syrup. Change instead to things we can actually use - like industrial hemp byproducts (truly a crop well suited for value-added processes that enrich local economies) and land for habitat (which is appealing both to folks who like to look at nature and to people who value its existence even though they never really see it). What I can't wait for is the day I get to ride on the back of a bison through a giant field of organic hemp wearing nothing but a loincloth made of hemp fibers and bison fur. Doesn't that sound like the kind of American dream we could get behind?